A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (2024)

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess.

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

  • Journals
      • Active Journals
      • Find a Journal
      • Proceedings Series
  • Topics
  • Information
      • For Authors
      • For Reviewers
      • For Editors
      • For Librarians
      • For Publishers
      • For Societies
      • For Conference Organizers
      • Open Access Policy
      • Institutional Open Access Program
      • Special Issues Guidelines
      • Editorial Process
      • Research and Publication Ethics
      • Article Processing Charges
      • Awards
      • Testimonials
  • Author Services
  • Initiatives
  • About
      • Overview
      • Contact
      • Careers
      • News
      • Press
      • Blog

Sign In / Sign Up Submit

Journals

Buildings

Volume 14

Issue 6

10.3390/buildings14061841

Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue

► Article Menu

Article Menu

Article Views
Citations -
  • Table of Contents

announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles

thumb_up ... Endorse textsms ... Comment

Need Help?

Support

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Get Support

Feedback

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Give Feedback

Information

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

Get Information

clear

JSmol Viewer

clear

first_page

settings

Order Article Reprints

Font Type:

Arial Georgia Verdana

Font Size:

Aa Aa Aa

Line Spacing:

Column Width:

Background:

This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.

Article

by

Mistreselasie Abate

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (9)Mistreselasie Abate

1A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (10),

Ana Catarina Jorge Evangelista

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (11)Ana Catarina Jorge Evangelista

1,*A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (12) and

Vivian W. Y. Tam

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (13)Vivian W. Y. Tam

2

1

School of Engineering, Civil Engineering, Engineering Institute of Technology, Perth, WA 6005, Australia

2

School of Engineering, Design and Built Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia

*

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Buildings 2024, 14(6), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Submission received: 13 March 2024 / Revised: 9 May 2024 / Accepted: 12 June 2024 / Published: 17 June 2024

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Study on Concrete Structures)

Download PDF

VersionsNotes

Abstract

An earthquake is one of the most significant and shocking natural disasters ever documented anywhere on the planet. Throughout history, it has claimed millions of lives and wreaked devastation on infrastructure. Because earthquake forces are spontaneous and unpredictable, engineering methods must be honed to investigate buildings under the impact of these forces. The dynamic and static computations of four RC multistory structure prototypes with various elevations in a high seismic zone are compared in this paper. The project under review is modeled as a 3, 6, 12, and 18-story establishment, and it is analyzed employing ETABS vs. 2019. The Equivalent Lateral Force (ELF) Procedure is used for static experimentation, while the Response Spectrum (RS) Procedure is employed for dynamic investigation. Both calculations are performed as per the EUROCODE 8-2004 recommendation. The ELF seismic load practice utilized was for the country of Norway, which has similar parameters to the ES-EN 8-15 seismic regulation Type I target RS, with ag/g = 0.1, spectrum type = I, soil factor S = 1.3 ground type, spectrum period (Tb, Tc, and Td) 0.1 s, 0.25 s, and 1.5 s. For the RS investigation, the parameters employed are as per ESEN-2015, ag/g = 0.1, and the spectrum type = I and ground type = B parameters were involved in the same manner for the RS analysis. The soil factor was set to 1.35; the spectrum period was set to (Tb, Tc, and Td) 0.05 s, 0.25 s, and 1.2 s. The behavior factor = 3.8, the lower bound factor = 0.2, and the damping ratio = 0.05. The results are then compared by employing different components such as displacement, story drift, story stiffness, base story shear, and story moment. Ultimately, a comparison of static and dynamic investigations has been carried out. Compared to the RS approach, the ELF technique produces more additional displacement, total drift, and base shear. As per the findings of this paper, for high-rise and tall buildings, dynamic analysis such as RS should be used rather than static analysis (ELF).

Keywords: base shear; equivalent lateral force; story drift; response spectrum; displacement; static analysis; dynamic analysis; linear analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abate, M.; Evangelista, A.C.J.; Tam, V.W.Y. A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code. Buildings 2024, 14, 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

AMA Style

Abate M, Evangelista ACJ, Tam VWY. A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code. Buildings. 2024; 14(6):1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abate, Mistreselasie, Ana Catarina Jorge Evangelista, and Vivian W. Y. Tam. 2024. "A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code" Buildings 14, no. 6: 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Cite

Export citation file: BibTeX | EndNote | RIS

MDPI and ACS Style

Abate, M.; Evangelista, A.C.J.; Tam, V.W.Y. A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code. Buildings 2024, 14, 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

AMA Style

Abate M, Evangelista ACJ, Tam VWY. A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code. Buildings. 2024; 14(6):1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abate, Mistreselasie, Ana Catarina Jorge Evangelista, and Vivian W. Y. Tam. 2024. "A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code" Buildings 14, no. 6: 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

clear

Buildings, EISSN 2075-5309, Published by MDPI

RSS Content Alert

Further Information

Article Processing Charges Pay an Invoice Open Access Policy Contact MDPI Jobs at MDPI

Guidelines

For Authors For Reviewers For Editors For Librarians For Publishers For Societies For Conference Organizers

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (14)

© 1996-2024 MDPI (Basel, Switzerland) unless otherwise stated

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy

A Comparison Analysis of Buildings as per Norwegian and Ethiopia ES-EN1998-1 Seismic Code (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Last Updated:

Views: 5510

Rating: 5 / 5 (70 voted)

Reviews: 85% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: The Hon. Margery Christiansen

Birthday: 2000-07-07

Address: 5050 Breitenberg Knoll, New Robert, MI 45409

Phone: +2556892639372

Job: Investor Mining Engineer

Hobby: Sketching, Cosplaying, Glassblowing, Genealogy, Crocheting, Archery, Skateboarding

Introduction: My name is The Hon. Margery Christiansen, I am a bright, adorable, precious, inexpensive, gorgeous, comfortable, happy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.